In recent posts, I reviewed the City of Richardson's system of representation by at-large elections of its seven city council members. In
one post, I pointed out how Dallas's city council (elected in single-member districts) was likely to divide on the issue of a $300 million flood control project that would be of most benefit to only a portion of the city. In
another post, I pointed out how Richardson's city council (elected at-large) had pulled together on the West Spring Valley Corridor Reinvestment Strategy that will be of most benefit to only a portion of the city.
David Chenoweth responds in a
long post on his own blog titled "Logic, Absurdity and Single Member Districts." I can't tell for sure, but I feel like he thinks his post supplies the "logic" and mine the "absurdity." [Update: Chenoweth clarifies that he was not referring to me or my argument as absurd. I regret the false conclusion on my part.]
After the jump, a brief look at his "logic."