City Council Election Quiz

This quiz is about the May 14 Richardson City Council election. It has three questions. Take your time.

• Question: The tweets below were all posted at almost the exact same time. Which one's timing was most likely just accidental that it was simultaneous to the others?
  

  
  

• Two-part Question: Who is the real voice behind these candidates? And, if the candidates are willing to turn their Twitter accounts over to him or her, what else are they willing to turn over?

  
  

• Essay Question: If you are not yet on the city council, you are not yet bound by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Still, if open and transparent government is a key goal of your election campaign, would you feel at least a moral obligation to be open and transparent with the electorate about schedules, agendas and minutes of any meetings you have with four other candidates -- a potential quorum and majority on the new city council you are all running for? Why or why not? Discuss. (For bonus points, include in your discussion the concept of a "walking quorum.")

Grading will be on a curve.

Richardson Idol: Week Four

Richardson Idol aired two episodes this week. Tuesday night's show was sponsored by the Berkner Park Neighborhood Association. Unfortunately, it was only a "Meet and Greet" so our contestants did not take the stage and perform. Thursday night's show was sponsored by the Turquoise Council for Americans and Eurasians.

Twelve of thirteen contestants vying for the grand prize, a seat on the Richardson City Council, performed on our stage for our judges Thursday night (absent: North; seriously tardy: Mitchell)

As the format requires, it is up to the audience (and by audience, I mean me) to eliminate one contestant each week until we have a council. (The recap of last week's show can be found here.)

But before we hear who will be eliminated this week, let's first hand out superlatives ... after the jump.

Un-Tree the Town, I Say

"They took all the trees
And put them in a tree museum
Then they charged the people
A dollar and a half just to see 'em
Don't it always seem to go,
That you don't know what you've got
'Til it's gone
They paved paradise
And put up a parking lot."
-- Joni Mitchell

A public meeting is planned for April 27 for public input on location and design for a new "mini-neighborhood park" in the Richardson Heights and Cottonwood Heights areas. It's great to see this 2010 Bond item moving forward. It's rare to see buildings giving way and trees making a comeback in a developed area.

Then I got to thinking about parks in general. And that made me think about one undeveloped part of Richardson in particular (yes, there is at least one such gem left). And that led me to flip-flop on a vision/dream/fantasy I've long had about that gem of nature. Yep, flip-flop. I'm now thinking that some trees, at least a few anyway, just might have to go. I'm suggesting "Un-Tree the Town," at least a little bit, in one very specific location.

After the jump, please stop me if I'm making a big mistake.

Another Letter From Andrew Laska

In a series of emails, Richardson resident Andrew Laska is offering his opinions about the May 14 Richardson city council election. I published the first such email here. Now, he's written another. I won't republish each of his epistles, but I may comment occasionally.

After the jump, one of my occasional comments.

Ain't No Denying, It Was About Slavery

"CHARLESTON, APRIL 12 - The ball has been opened at last, and war has been inaugurated. The batteries on Sullivan's Island, Morris Island, and other points, opened on Fort Sumter at 4 o'clock this morning. Fort Sumter returned the fire, and a brisk cannonading has been kept up."
-- Philadelphia Inquirer, 1861

One hundred and fifty years ago today, Civil War hostilities commenced with Confederate forces firing on Fort Sumter. By the time of Lee's surrender at Appomattox four years later, over 600,000 people had died in the war. Today, despite the gallant battle re-enactments by Civil War buffs in gray and blue costumes, the war and especially its shameful cause remain the darkest stain on American history.

I've blogged about it before, but it's worth repeating the cause of the war, as spelled out by the people of the day, in their own declarations of secession, and not the causes chosen by revisionist historians and the apologists for secession ever since. One principle dominates those original declarations of secession and it's not states' rights. It's the defense of slavery. States' rights, when it's mentioned at all, is used in defense of slavery, the ultimate casus belli.

Here are links to my articles on the subject from earlier this year:

• South Carolina's Shameful Sesquicentennial.
  
• Texas's attitude towards the "debasing doctrine of equality".